Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaravelioğlu, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorKarapınar, Hekim
dc.contributor.authorÖzkurt, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorSarıkaya, Savaş
dc.contributor.authorKüçükdurmaz, Zekeriya
dc.contributor.authorArısoy, Arif
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Recep
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Mehmet G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:57:48Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:57:48Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKaravelioğlu, Y., Karapınar, H., Özkurt, S., Sarıkaya, S., Küçükdurmaz, Z., Arısoy, A., Kurt, R., Yılmaz, A.[et.al.]. (2014). Evaluation of atrial electromechanical coupling times in hemodialysis patients. Echocardiography, 31(4), 449-455.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-2822
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/echo.12422
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1011
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThere are no definite data about the atrial electromechanical coupling times (AEMCT) in patients with end stage renal failure (ESRF). The aim of this study was to investigate the AEMCT in ESRF patients without hypertension (HT) and diabetes mellitus.MethodsThe study population consisted of 47 normotensive, nondiabetic ESRF patients and 41 healthy age/gender-matched control subjects. The time intervals from the onset of P-wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the beginning of late diastolic A-wave (PA) were obtained from the lateral mitral annulus (PA-lateral, maximum AEMCT), septal annulus (PA-septal), and tricuspid lateral annulus (PA-tricuspid). Time intervals were corrected according to the heart rate. The difference between PA-septal and PA-tricuspid (right AEMCT), PA-lateral and PA-septal (left AEMCT), and PA-lateral and PA-tricuspid (inter AEMCT) were calculated. Corrected time intervals were used for calculations.ResultsGroups were similar for age (52 ± 12.3 vs. 49.9 ± 6 years, P > 0.05) and gender. Maximum (61 ± 20 vs. 47 ± 13 ms; P < 0.001) AEMCT was significantly higher in the patients compared with the control group, but septal and tricuspid EMCT were not different (P > 0.05). Both inter-atrial (37 ± 21 vs. 24 ± 16 ms, P = 0.002) and left atrial (25 ± 18 vs. 12 ± 9 ms; P < 0.001) EMCT were significantly higher in patients when compared with the controls but intra-right atrial EMCT was not different.ConclusionsAtrial conduction parameters such as maximal EMCT, left atrial, and inter-atrial EMCTs were prolonged in ESRF patients. This prolongation is seen in ESRF patients even in the absence of factors that affect atrial coupling, such as HT. © 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Inc.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/echo.12422en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAtrial Fibrillationen_US
dc.subjectEnd Stage Renal Failureen_US
dc.subjectHemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectInter-Atrial Electromechanical Coupling Timeen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of atrial electromechanical coupling times in hemodialysis patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEchocardiographyen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage449en_US
dc.identifier.endpage455en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster