Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzlek, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorÖzlek, Eda
dc.contributor.authorZencirkıran Ağuş, Hicaz
dc.contributor.authorTekinalp, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorÇil, Cem
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorBekar, Lütfü
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:58:19Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:58:19Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationÖzlek, B., Özlek, E., Ağuş, H. Z., Tekinalp, M., Kahraman, S., Çil, C., ... & Rencüzoğulları, I. (2019). Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF have different clinical characteristics in Turkey: A multicenter observational study. European journal of internal medicine, 61, 88-95.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0953-6205
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2018.11.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1113
dc.description.abstractBackground: To determine and compare the demographic characteristics, clinical profile and management of patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in a Turkish cohort. Methods: The APOLLON trial (A comPrehensive, ObservationaL registry of heart faiLure with mid-range and preserved ejection fractiON) is an observational and multicenter study conducted in Turkey. Consecutive patients admitted to the cardiology clinics who were at least 18 years of age and had HFmrEF or HFpEF were included (NCT03026114). Results: The study population included 1065 (mean age of 67.1 ± 10.6 years, 54% women) patients from 12 sites in Turkey. Among participants, 246 (23.1%) had HFmrEF and 819 (76.9%) had HFpEF. Compared to patients with HFpEF, those with HFmrEF were more likely to be male (57.7 vs 42.2%; p < 0.001), had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (853 vs 528 pg/ml, p < 0.001), were more likely to have ECG abnormalities (72.4 vs 53.5%, p < 0.001) and hospitalization history for heart failure (28 vs 18.6%; p = 0.002). HFmrEF patients were more likely to use ?-blockers (69.9 vs 55.2%, p < 0.001), aldosterone receptor antagonists (24 vs 14.7%, p = 0.001), statins (37 vs 23%, p < .001), and loop diuretics (39.8 vs 30.5%, p = 0.006) compared to patients with HFpEF. Conclusions: The results of APOLLON study support that the basic characteristics and etiology of HFmrEF are significantly different from HFpEF. This registry also showed that the patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF were younger but undertreated in Turkey compared to patients in western countries. © 2018 European Federation of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ejim.2018.11.001en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinic Profileen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectHeart Failure With Mid-Range Ejection Fractionen_US
dc.subjectHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fractionen_US
dc.titlePatients with HFpEF and HFmrEF have different clinical characteristics in Turkey: A multicenter observational studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.endpage95en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster