Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCan, Sema
dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Nevin
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Erşan
dc.contributor.authorBiernat, Elzbieta
dc.contributor.authorErsöz, Gülfem
dc.contributor.authorKilit, Bülent
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:02:40Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:02:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationCan, S., Gündüz, N., Arslan, E., Biernat, E., Ersöz, G., Kilit, B. (2016). Multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 29(6), 937-945.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1232-1087
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1300
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to examine the multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers. Material and Methods: Fifty healthy women (age (mean ± standard deviation): 34.8±5.9 years, body height: 158±0.4 cm, body weight: 61.8±7.5 kg, body mass index: 24.6±2.7 kg/m2) workers from the same workplace volunteered to participate in the study. Physical activity was measured with the 7-day Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (7-d PAAQ), an objective multi-sensor armband tool, and also a waist-mounted pedometer, which were both worn for 7 days. Results: A significant correlation between step numbers measured by armband and pedometer was observed (r = 0.735), but the step numbers measured by these 2 methods were significantly different (10 941±2236 steps/day and 9170±2377 steps/day, respectively; p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between the value of 7-d PAAQ total energy expenditure and the value of armband total energy expenditure (r = 0.394, p = 0.005). However, total energy expenditure values measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (2081±370 kcal/day and 2084±197 kcal/day, respectively; p = 0.96). In addition, physical activity levels (average daily metabolic equivalents (MET)) measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (1.45±0.12 MET/day and 1.47±0.24 MET/day, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the correlation between pedometer and armband measurements was higher than that between armband measurements and 7-d PAAQ self-reports. Our results suggest that none of the assessment methods examined here, 7-d PAAQ, pedometer, or armband, is sufficient when used as a single tool for physical activity level determination. Therefore, multi-instrument assessment methods are preferable.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbHen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00710en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFemale Office Workersen_US
dc.subjectPedometeren_US
dc.subjectPhysical Activityen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectSedentary Lifestyleen_US
dc.subjectSensewear Armbanden_US
dc.titleMulti-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workersen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Healthen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Eğitimi Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage937en_US
dc.identifier.endpage945en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster