Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBeker Acay, Mehtap
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKatırağ, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorÜlker, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorAcay, Akif
dc.contributor.authorYücel, Aylin
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:03:20Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationBeker Acay, M., Fidan, N., Ünlü, E., Katırağ, A., Ülker, H., Acay, A., Yücel, A. (2015). The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010–2012. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 21(4), 322-326.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.14451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1452
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the analysis and publication rates of abstracts presented at the Turkish National Radiology meetings in 2010–2012. METHODS: Abstracts presented in the national radiology meetings of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were included in the study. The presentations were classified according to presentation type (oral or poster presentations), study type, study design, imaged organ or body systems, imaging modalities, time interval between the presentation and the publication date, and the journal in which the article was published. The conversion rate of presentations into full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals were surveyed through PubMed. The time from presentation in the meetings to publication was determined. The distribution of journals was also demonstrated. RESULTS: The total number of presentations submitted in three national radiology meetings was 3,192. The publication rate was 11% for the 2010 meeting, 8.2% for the 2011 meeting, and 9.6% for the 2012 meeting. A total of 300 papers were published, with an average of 15 months (range, 0–42 months) between presentation and final publication. The first three refereed international journals with the most number of papers derived from these meetings were Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Imaging, and European Journal of Radiology. CONCLUSION: The overall publication rate of scientific abstracts from Turkey was lower than those from overseas countries. Encouraging the authors to conduct higher-quality research would raise the publication rate as well as improve the quality and success of our scientific meetings. © Turkish Society of Radiology 2015en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5152/dir.2015.14451en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.titleThe fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalDiagnostic and Interventional Radiologyen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage322en_US
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster