Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAyhan Başer, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorKahveci, Rabia
dc.contributor.authorBaydar Artantaş, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorYaşar, İlknur
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Esra Meltem
dc.contributor.authorKasım, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorKunnamo, Ilkka
dc.contributor.authorÖzkara, Adem
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12730
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1499
dc.description.abstractRationale, aims, objectives: Clinical Practice Guidelines are mostly developed by 3 methods; namely, de novo, adoption, and adaptation. Nonpublished studies and authors experience shows that most guidelines in Turkey are either by adoption or by adaptation. There is no available local tool for adaptation, so the process is not standardized and most of the time not explicitly defined. The objective of this study is to search for international guideline adaptation tools and test their feasibility in Turkish context, to serve a final goal of developing a unique local strategic tool for guideline adaptation. Methods: The methodological design of this study includes selection of an international tool for Clinical Practice Guideline adaptation, piloting this tool with selected Turkish guidelines, identifying the feasibility of this tool and exploring the needs for adaptation of the tool, drawing recommendations for adaptation of the strategies, and validation of the process by local experts. Results: The study from planning phase to finalizing the guidance, including pilot studies and panel but excluding translation of ADAPTE, lasted 18 months. Nine researchers were involved in the adaptation process and 15 more experts were involved in the validation panel. Following the suggestions of the research team on modifications and validation through the expert panel; 2 steps of the ADAPTE toolkit were rejected, 2 steps were accepted by modification, 7 steps were accepted by additional recommendations. In addition, 2 tools were suggested to be added to the toolkit. Conclusion: This is the first study on adaptation of guidelines in Turkey. Pilot adaptation of 2 guidelines with ADAPTE revealed that ADAPTE is a useful and feasible tool in Turkish setting, but might require certain changes in recommendations and revision of tools. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/jep.12730en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinical Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicineen_US
dc.titleExploring guideline adaptation strategy for Turkey: Is “ADAPTE” feasible or does it need adaptation as well?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.endpage104en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster