Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKalem, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Ercan
dc.contributor.authorSongür, Murat
dc.contributor.authorZehir, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorArmangil, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDemirtaş, Mehmet A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:08:19Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:08:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationKalem, M., Şahin, E., Songür, M., Zehir, S., Armangil, M., Demirtas, M. (2015). Role of anti-adhesive barriers following rotator cuff repair surgery: an experimental study. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 50(2), 227-33 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0134
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1977
dc.description.abstractObjective: This experimental study investigates the effectiveness of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Dualmesh®, Gore Medical, Flagstaff, AZ, USA), sodium hyaluronate-carboxymethyl cellulose (Seprafilm ®, Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA), and polysiloxane (silicone) as anti-adhesive barriers for inhibition of fibrosis in the subacromial area following rotator cuff repair. Methods: Rabbit rotator cuff tenotomy and repair was conducted on 24 rabbits in 4 groups: control (Group A), Dualmesh® (Group B), Seprafilm® (Group C), and silicone (Group D). Anti-adhesive barrier materials were sutured over the repaired rotator cuff. Macroscopic and histological evaluations were made at the end of the sixth postoperative week. Results: Macroscopic evaluation revealed that minimal adhesion occurred in the control and silicone groups, while the Seprafilm® and Dualmesh® groups showed evidence of fibrosis. Microscopic evaluation revealed diffuse fibrosis and collagen accumulation in the Dualmesh® and Seprafilm® groups, whereas minimal collagen deposition and inflammatory cell reaction was found among the silicone and control groups. Significant differences were found between the silicone and Dualmesh® (p=0.001) and silicone and Seprafilm® groups (p=0.002), as well as between the control and Dualmesh® (p=0.002) and control and Seprafilm® groups (p=0.002). Conclusion: Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE/Dualmesh®) and sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (SH-CMC/Seprafilm®) did not prevent or attenuate postoperative subacromial fibrosis following cuff tear repair. Nor did silicone prevent or attenuate fibrosis. More detailed research is needed for development of an effective anti-adhesive barrier for use after rotator cuff tear surgery. © 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherEkin Medical Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0134en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntiadhesive Barrieren_US
dc.subjectRotator Cuffen_US
dc.subjectSubacromial Fibrosisen_US
dc.titleRole of anti-adhesive barriers following rotator cuff repair surgery: An experimental studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalActa Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcicaen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume50en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage227en_US
dc.identifier.endpage233en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster