dc.contributor.author | Şenel, Engin | |
dc.contributor.author | Demir, Emre | |
dc.contributor.author | Artüz, Refika Ferda | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-10T09:38:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-10T09:38:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Şenel, E., Demir, E., Artüz, R. F. (2018). A bibliometric
evaluation of global productivity of teledermatology publications between 1975 and 2017 with a 3-year update. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 63(5), 437-439. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0019-5154 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_295_17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11491/525 | |
dc.description.abstract | Sir, Telemedicine is a constantly evolving technique that allows medical information and services to be accessed by transferring them from hard-to-reach areas with the opportunities of modern technology. There are many studies in the literature which show that telemedicine is as effective as face-to-face evaluation.[1] Teledermatology is one of the fastest growing branches of telemedicine thanks to modern communication technology. Bibliometrics is statistical and holistic evaluation of scientific literature in a certain field.[2] Although both have been popular study areas in recent years, to the best of our knowledge, only a few bibliometric reports have been published in teledermatology. In 2014, we published a study of the teledermatology productivity of the different countries, and we evaluated teledermatology publications between 1980 and 2013.[3] A year later in 2015, we published an update to this work.[4]Sir, Telemedicine is a constantly evolving technique that allows medical information and services to be accessed by transferring them from hard-to-reach areas with the opportunities of modern technology. There are many studies in the literature which show that telemedicine is as effective as face-to-face evaluation.[1] Teledermatology is one of the fastest growing branches of telemedicine thanks to modern communication technology. Bibliometrics is statistical and holistic evaluation of scientific literature in a certain field.[2] Although both have been popular study areas in recent years, to the best of our knowledge, only a few bibliometric reports have been published in teledermatology. In 2014, we published a study of the teledermatology productivity of the different countries, and we evaluated teledermatology publications between 1980 and 2013.[3] A year later in 2015, we published an update to this work.[4] | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.4103/ijd.IJD_295_17 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | [Belirlenecek] | en_US |
dc.title | A bibliometric evaluation of global productivity of teledermatology publications between 1975 and 2017 with a 3-year update | en_US |
dc.type | other | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Indian Journal of Dermatology | en_US |
dc.department | Hitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-3834-3864 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8098-1686 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 63 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 437 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 439 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |