| dc.contributor.author | Uslu, Ferit | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-01T14:58:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-01T14:58:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-61275-054-5 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2160-1070 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11491/6473 | |
| dc.description | International Conference on Social Science and Health (ICSSH 2013) -- JAN 30-31, 2012-2013 -- Los Angeles, CA | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper deals with the demarcation problem in philosophy of science. In this context, I look for answers from logical positivists to Popper and to nowadays philosophers to the following questions: What makes a text, a theory or a research scientific? How can we demarcate science and scientific views from metaphysical thoughts, ideologies, pseudo-sciences and conspiracy theories? What are the distinguishing characteristics of scientific method? | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Informat Engn Res Inst | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Information Engineering Research Inst, Usa | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Social Science And Health | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Scientific | en_US |
| dc.subject | Demarcation problem | en_US |
| dc.subject | Pseudo-science | en_US |
| dc.subject | Criteria of science | en_US |
| dc.title | Ongoing Debate: How Can We Demarcate Science From Non-Science? | en_US |
| dc.type | conferenceObject | en_US |
| dc.department | [Belirlenecek] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 285 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 288 | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
| dc.department-temp | [Uslu, Ferit] Hitit Univ, Fac Div, TR-19100 Corum, Turkey | en_US |
| dc.contributor.institutionauthor | [Belirlenecek] | |
| dc.authorwosid | Uslu, Ferit / H-2591-2013 | |
| dc.description.wospublicationid | WOS:000318956300049 | en_US |
