Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArslan, Sertaç
dc.contributor.authorMundt, Filip
dc.contributor.authorMetintaş, Selma
dc.contributor.authorAk, Güntülü
dc.contributor.authorDobra, Katalin
dc.contributor.authorHjerpe, Anders
dc.contributor.authorMetintaş, Muzaffer
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T14:58:25Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T14:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2148-3620
dc.identifier.issn2148-5402
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/ejp.2017.50023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/6641
dc.description.abstractObjective: Tumor biomarkers are promising study areas for the early or differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of analyzing serum N-ERC/mesothelin, C-ERC/mesothelin, hyaluronan, osteopontin, and syndecan-1 levels for distinguishing patients with MPM from those with metastatic malignant pleural diseases (MMPDs), benign pleural diseases (BPDs), and benign asbestos pleurisy (BAP). Methods: Tumor biomarker levels of serum samples of 230 cases were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Results: All investigated biomarkers did not reveal sufficient diagnostic information to distinguish MPM from MMPD. N-ERC/mesothelin showed moderate ability to distinguish MPM from BPDs and particularly BAP (sensitivities of 67% and 73%, respectively, and specificities of 84% and 86%, respectively). C-ERC/mesothelin had a lower efficacy than N-ERC/mesothelin, whereas osteopontin had a high specificity for distinguishing MPM from other pleural diseases (80%) but with a poor sensitivity (32%). Hyaluronan and syndecan-1 had only limited effects as individual biomarkers. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that all the studied biomarkers could contribute, and a logistic model improved their performance, with the receiver operating characteristic curve plot showing an area under the curve of 0.75. Thus, the investigated biomarkers were unable to provide sufficient sensitivity and specificity levels; however, they all may contribute as a basis for an expanded logistic multiparameter model. Conclusion: Patients with high N-ERC/mesothelin and C-ERC/mesothelin levels have a high risk for MPM; appropriate invasive procedures should be performed. The patients who have high tumor biomarker levels and undefinite histopathological investigation results at the first-line procedure, should be managed using further invasive procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEurasian Journal Of Pulmonologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHyaluronanen_US
dc.subjectmegakaryocyte potentiating factoren_US
dc.subjectmesothelinen_US
dc.subjectmesotheliomaen_US
dc.subjectosteopontinen_US
dc.subjectsyndecan-1en_US
dc.titlePredicting Malignant Mesothelioma by Analyzing Serum N-ERC/Mesothelin, C-ERC/Mesothelin, Hyaluronan, Osteopontin, and Syndecan-1 Levelsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage130en_US
dc.identifier.endpage138en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Arslan, Sertac] Hitit Univ, Dept Pulmonol, Sch Med, Corum, Turkey; [Mundt, Filip; Dobra, Katalin; Hjerpe, Anders] Karolinska Inst, Div Pathol, Dept Lab Med, Stockholm, Sweden; [Metintas, Selma] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Eskisehir, Turkey; [Ak, Guntulu; Metintas, Muzaffer] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Lung & Pleural Canc Applicat & Res Ctr, Sch Med, Eskisehir, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorArslan, Sertaç
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/ejp.2017.50023
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000416688200004en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster