Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArik, Emine
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, T.
dc.contributor.authorOzciftci, S.
dc.contributor.authorAlptekin, A.
dc.contributor.authorBalas, S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T15:05:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T15:05:09Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0003-2417
dc.identifier.issn1432-055X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00746-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7140
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the analgesic efficacy of unilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with local anesthetic infiltration, applied to the port site in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Group T received a unilateral subcostal TAP block, group I received a local anesthetic infiltration at port sites, and group C was the control group. Groups T and I received 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol was similarly applied to all groups. Postoperative pain levels during rest and cough were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Nausea and vomiting were evaluated using postoperative nausea vomiting scores (PONV) at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24h and tramadol consumption was also determined. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a Likert-type scale. Results Postoperative resting NRS scores were lower in group T than the other groups at 1 h and 12 h (p = 0.007 and p = 0.016), while NRS values during cough were statistically significant at 1 h (p = 0.004). The 24-h tramadol consumption was different: group T 229 +/- 33 mg, group I 335 +/- 95 mg, and group C 358 +/- 66 mg (p< 0.001). The percentages of patients reporting that they would prefer the applied postoperative pain control method again were 83.3%, 62.5% and 70.8% in groups T, I and C, respectively (p = 0.118). Conclusion Unilateral subcostal TAP block was superior to local anesthetic infiltration at port sites after LC, in terms of low opioid consumption. Unilateral subcostal TAP block is recommended as part of a multimodal analgesic protocol.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesisten_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic cholecystectomyen_US
dc.subjectUnilateral transversus abdominis plane blocken_US
dc.subjectPort-site infiltrationen_US
dc.subjectPost-operative analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectOpioid consumptionen_US
dc.titleUnilateral transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy in laparoscopic cholecystectomyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.authoridbalas, sener / 0000-0002-9154-3179
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage270en_US
dc.identifier.endpage276en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-temp[Arik, Emine] Univ Hlth Sci, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Ankara, Turkey; [Akkaya, T.; Alptekin, A.] Univ Hlth Sci, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Pain Clin, Ankara, Turkey; [Ozciftci, S.] Hitit Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, TC Minist Hlth, Erol Olcok Training & Res Hosp, Corum, Turkey; [Balas, S.] Univ Hlth Sci, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Res Hosp, Dept Surg, Ankara, Turkeyen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor[Belirlenecek]
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00101-020-00746-1
dc.authorwosidbalas, sener / AAU-4681-2021
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000524173800007en_US
dc.description.scopuspublicationid2-s2.0-85081714782en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationidPubMed: 32166395en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster