Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKısa, Alperen
dc.contributor.authorKoruk, Senem
dc.contributor.authorKocoglu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorLeblebici, İhsan Metin
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T18:14:53Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T18:14:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2149-2042
dc.identifier.issn2149-4606
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.5222/MMJ.2019.37929
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpnek5qa3lNZz09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7556
dc.description.abstractObjective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) operations are being performed under general anesthesia (GA). Further studies are needed on the issue whether these operations can be performed under spinal anes-thesia (SA). In this study we aimed to compare SA with (GA) in terms of efficacy and complications in patients who will undergo LC operations, and to investigate the effects of preemptive analgesia on the development of shoulder pain, transition to general anesthesia, and postoperative analgesia.Method: Sixty patients in ASA I-II risk group between 18-65 years of age undergoing laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy were randomly divided into general anesthesia (GA, n=30) and spinal anesthesia (SA, n=30) groups. Patients were premedicated with i.v. midazolam and fentanyl preoperatively. Anesthesia was induced with propofol in the GA group, and maintained with Desflurane and remifentanil. In the SA group, spinal anes-thesia was provided with intratechal administration of 15 mg bupivacaine at L2-3 level, and block level was increased to T4 by keeping the patient in Trendelenburg position for 7-10 minutes. Demographic data, hemo-dynamic parameters, operation time, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 0th,1st, 4th, 8th,12th and 24th hours, patient-surgeon satisfaction, side effects, and occurrence of right shoulder pain in SA group were inquired and recorded.Results: Effective anesthesia was produced in both groups. Hypotension was observed in 5, bradycardia requiring atropin administration in 4, and perioperative shoulder pain in 9 patients in Group SA, but none of them required general anesthesia. Hypotension developed in one patient in Group GA. The postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower in Group SA at 0th,1st, 4th hours. Patient satisfection scores were higher in Group SA. Conclusion: We concluded that spinal anesthesia may be an alternative method to general anesthesia in patients who will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations especially when the risk of general an-esthesia is too high.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedeniyet Medical Journalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keywords]en_US
dc.titleComparison of General Anesthesia with Spinal Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Operationsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.department[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage346en_US
dc.identifier.endpage353en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempHitit Üniversitesi Erol Olcok Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye;İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Göztepe Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiyeen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor[Belirlenecek]
dc.identifier.doi10.5222/MMJ.2019.37929
dc.description.scopuspublicationid2-s2.0-85077579817en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster