Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Engin
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Emre
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T18:18:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T18:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationYildirim, E., & Demir, E. (2019). Comparative bibliometric analysis of fertility preservation. Annals of Medical Research, 26(8), 1622-1628.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.06.339
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpFM056WTJOZz09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7910
dc.description.abstractAim: Fertility preservation (FP) has become an important issue for both women and men, due to oncological therapies, gonadotoxic treatments, surgeries, and infertility. The aim of this study is to investigate the publications related to FP, identify the top effective countries and journals, top productive researchers, and trend topics. Material and Methods: The data of this study were obtained using the Thomson Reuters WoS (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA) database, separately for females and males. In the bibliometric analysis, ‘fertility preservation’ was used as a keyword. VOSviewer (Version 1.6.6) was utilized for bibliometric network visualizations. SPSS was used for the statistical analyses (Version 22.0) Results: Analysis results of the keywords used for men indicated 817 publications and for females indicated 2531 publications totally. The United States of America (USA) was the top country for the publications about both genders. The top three research fields for both genders were Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Biology, and Oncology. The journals that contributed to the literature most were Fertility and Sterility and Human Reproduction respectively in both gender categories. The correlation between the number of total fertility preservation articles and total cancers,Gross Domestic Product-World Bank (GDP-WB), Gross Domestic Product-International Monetary Fund (GDP-IMF), Human Development Index (HDI), and Internet Users (IU) was significant (r=0.482, p=0.017; r=0.609, p<0.001; r=0.620, p<0.001; r=0.365, p=0.043; r=0.479, p=0.006). Conclusion: It has been determined that researches on the protection of the fertility of cancer patients and infertile patients have increased from past to present. Also, it is observed that the economies of countries have an active role in research productivity.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBibliometricsen_US
dc.subjectFertility Preservationen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.titleComparative bibliometric analysis of fertility preservationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1622en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1628en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.department-tempHitit Üniversitesi;Hitit Üniversitesien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYıldırım, Engin
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDemir, Emre
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.06.339


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster