Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCevher, Selim
dc.contributor.authorÜçer, Mehmet Barış
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Tayfun
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T12:19:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T12:19:08Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationCevher S, Barış Üçer M, Şahin T. Disc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship? Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology. 2022;14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2515-8414
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221096062
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/8443
dc.description.abstractBackground: The distance between the optic disc center and the fovea is a biometric parameter; however, it is unclear whether DFD (disc–fovea distance) affects the choroidal thickness. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between DFD and choroidal thickness. Design: This is a prospective, and cross-sectional study. Methods: Two hundred fifty eyes of 250 healthy participants were examined in terms of DFD, age, axial length, spherical equivalent, and choroidal thickness. Inclusion criteria included aged between 20–40 years, no posterior segment disorders, and participants with best-corrected visual acuity (10/10 according to Snellen’s chart). Participants with high hypermetropia (>4 diopter) or myopia (>6 diopter) or any systemic disease likely to affect choroidal thickness were excluded. Choroidal thickness measurements were performed at subfoveal, 1.0 mm temporal, and 1.0 mm nasal using the enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Results: The mean age of all the participants was 26.21 ± 5.73 years, mean DFD was 4634.29 ± 274.70 µm, mean axial length was 23.62 ± 0.83 mm, and mean spherical equivalent was −0.61 ± 1.06 diopter. The mean subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses were 388.73 ± 90.15 µm, 351.26 ± 88.09 µm, and 366.50 ± 79.56 µm, respectively. A negative correlation was found between subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses and axial length (r = −0.157, p = 0.013; r = −0.168, p = 0.008; r = −0.174, p = 0.006, respectively). Insignificant correlation was found between choroidal thicknesses and spherical equivalent (p > 0.05). There was not a statistically significant correlation between DFD and subfoveal, nasal, and temporal choroidal thicknesses (r = −0.028, p = 0.655; r = 0.030, p = 0.641; r = −0.025, p = 0.699, respectively). In addition, there was not a statistically significant correlation between age and choroidal thickness. Conclusion: This study shows that DFD and spherical equivalent do not affect choroidal thickness; axial length negatively affects choroidal thickness. In addition, age does not affect choroidal thickness between 20 and 40 years.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTHERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGYen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectChoroidal Thicknessen_US
dc.subjectDisc–Fovea Distanceen_US
dc.subjectEnhanced-Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomographyen_US
dc.subjectHealthy Participantsen_US
dc.titleDisc–fovea distance and choroidal thickness: is there a relationship?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7968-4876en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6807-4909en_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/25158414221096062en_US
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000798254600001en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationid35602660en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess