Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Muhammet Cihat
dc.contributor.authorKarayiğit, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Can
dc.contributor.authorDolu, Abdullah Kadir
dc.contributor.authorKalçık, Macit
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T11:39:18Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T11:39:18Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationÇelik, M. C., Karayiğit, O., Ozkan, C., Dolu, A. K., & Kalçık, M. (2023). Relationship between systemic inflammation index and no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiology, 74(4), 387-394.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3197
dc.identifier.issn1940-1574
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00033197221115562
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/8742
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between no-reflow phenomenon and systemic inflammation index (SII) and to compare the predictive capacity of SII together with the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A total of 785 patients were included. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow degree has been used to describe the no-reflow phenomenon. The study population was divided into two groups regarding the presence of no-reflow phenomenon including 110 patients with no-reflow (TIMI frame count 0-2) and 675 patients without no-reflow (TIMI frame count 3). The NLR [6.6 (4.6-11.6) vs 3.2 (2.0-5.3); P < .001], PLR [175 (121.3-220) vs 102.6 (76.1-150.1); P < .001] and SII [1921(1225-2906) vs 738.5 (450.5-1293); P < .001] were significantly higher in the no-reflow group. High NLR (OR: 1.078, 95%CI: 1.027-1.397; P = .021), PLR (OR: 1.009, 95%CI: 1.003-1.021; P = .041) and SII (OR: 1.216, 95%CI: 1.106-1.942; P = .004) were found to be independently associated with no-reflow phenomenon. The comparison of the receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that area under the curve of SII was greater than that of NLR (.789 vs .766, P = .007) and PLR (.789 vs .759, P = .048). SII levels may predict no-reflow phenomenon better than NLR and PLR.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngiologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRelationship Between Systemic Inflammation Index and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0033-4353en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6496-7849en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6255-711Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1142-5974en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇelik, Muhammet Cihat
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKalçık, Macit
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00033197221115562en_US
dc.authorwosidHOC-0196-2023en_US
dc.authorwosidHPD-5255-2023en_US
dc.description.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000828259200001en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationid35857618en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster