AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MAP PROJECTION TRANSFORMATION USING GIS TOOLS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOzerdem, Omer Zubeyr / 0000-0002-8750-9998
dc.authoridHacar, Muslum / 0000-0002-8737-8262
dc.authoridILCI, Veli / 0000-0002-9485-874X
dc.authoridKarabulut, Mustafa Fahri / 0000-0001-8513-3475
dc.authoridMemduhoglu, Abdulkadir / 0000-0002-9072-869X
dc.authoridGokgoz, Turkay / 0000-0001-8716-6131
dc.authorwosidOzerdem, Omer Zubeyr / AAO-4215-2021
dc.authorwosidHacar, Muslum / A-1181-2019
dc.authorwosidILCI, Veli / AAI-1611-2020
dc.authorwosidKarabulut, Mustafa Fahri / AAZ-8425-2020
dc.authorwosidMemduhoglu, Abdulkadir / AAZ-4474-2020
dc.authorwosidGokgoz, Turkay / G-5536-2018
dc.contributor.authorGokgoz, Turkay
dc.contributor.authorHacar, Muslum
dc.contributor.authorMemduhoglu, Abdulkadir
dc.contributor.authorIlci, Veli
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Mustafa Fahri
dc.contributor.authorTekin, Aydemir Can
dc.contributor.authorOzerdem, Omer Zubeyr
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T14:58:25Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T14:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.department[Belirlenecek]
dc.description.abstractTopographical maps with the projection of Gauss-Kroger/Transverse Mercator (GK/TM) and Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) are the primary inputs in many applications related to Geosciences. In these projections, each zone contains a separate coordinate system. For this reason, two adjoining map sheets located in different zones cannot be side by side theoretically. In such situations, map sheets must first be positioned on the same coordinate system in a geographical information system. In this study, three different transformations were performed using AutoCAD Map 3D, QGIS, MicroStation, ArcMap, Netcad, and Global Mapper: (1) among 3 degrees adjoining GK/TM zones, (2) from 3 degrees GK/TM to 6 degrees UTM, and (3) from 3 degrees GK/TM to the tangent and secant Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC) projection. The results were compared in terms of ellipsoidal values, projections, and programs. There were several limitations in the programs with regards to measurement, process precision, and deficiencies in terms of users. Since all three projections were conformal, angles were preserved. However, lengths that were different in each projection were also different from the ellipsoidal values, with the exception of secant LCC projection. Consequently, the appropriate method and program should be selected depending on the geographical location of study area, objective, expected accuracy, and precision.
dc.identifier.endpage117en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-7205
dc.identifier.issn1304-7191
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/6642
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000396584500009
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthor[Belirlenecek]
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherYildiz Technical Univ
dc.relation.ispartofSigma Journal Of Engineering And Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik Ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectGauss-Krogeren_US
dc.subjecttransverse Mercatoren_US
dc.subjectuniversal transverse Mercatoren_US
dc.subjectLambert conformal conic projectionen_US
dc.subjectzone transformationen_US
dc.subjectprojection transformationen_US
dc.titleAN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MAP PROJECTION TRANSFORMATION USING GIS TOOLS
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu