Exploring guideline adaptation strategy for Turkey: Is “ADAPTE” feasible or does it need adaptation as well?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAyhan Başer, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorKahveci, Rabia
dc.contributor.authorBaydar Artantaş, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorYaşar, İlknur
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Hilal
dc.contributor.authorKoç, Esra Meltem
dc.contributor.authorKasım, İsmail
dc.contributor.authorKunnamo, Ilkka
dc.contributor.authorÖzkara, Adem
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractRationale, aims, objectives: Clinical Practice Guidelines are mostly developed by 3 methods; namely, de novo, adoption, and adaptation. Nonpublished studies and authors experience shows that most guidelines in Turkey are either by adoption or by adaptation. There is no available local tool for adaptation, so the process is not standardized and most of the time not explicitly defined. The objective of this study is to search for international guideline adaptation tools and test their feasibility in Turkish context, to serve a final goal of developing a unique local strategic tool for guideline adaptation. Methods: The methodological design of this study includes selection of an international tool for Clinical Practice Guideline adaptation, piloting this tool with selected Turkish guidelines, identifying the feasibility of this tool and exploring the needs for adaptation of the tool, drawing recommendations for adaptation of the strategies, and validation of the process by local experts. Results: The study from planning phase to finalizing the guidance, including pilot studies and panel but excluding translation of ADAPTE, lasted 18 months. Nine researchers were involved in the adaptation process and 15 more experts were involved in the validation panel. Following the suggestions of the research team on modifications and validation through the expert panel; 2 steps of the ADAPTE toolkit were rejected, 2 steps were accepted by modification, 7 steps were accepted by additional recommendations. In addition, 2 tools were suggested to be added to the toolkit. Conclusion: This is the first study on adaptation of guidelines in Turkey. Pilot adaptation of 2 guidelines with ADAPTE revealed that ADAPTE is a useful and feasible tool in Turkish setting, but might require certain changes in recommendations and revision of tools. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.12730
dc.identifier.endpage104en_US
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12730
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1499
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectClinical Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicineen_US
dc.titleExploring guideline adaptation strategy for Turkey: Is “ADAPTE” feasible or does it need adaptation as well?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu