Finding the best formulas to estimate fetal weight based on ultrasound for the Turkish population: a comparison of 24 formulas

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorKoçak, Cem
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T15:05:23Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T15:05:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: Although prenatal diagnosis of fetal weight is a very important parameter that guides the clinician, the margin of error in fetal weight is still very high. Aims: The aim of this study is to identify the most accurate sonographic formulas for fetal weight estimation in general and specific gender subgroups of the Turkish population. Method: This study is a prospective study conducted with the term 160 pregnant women who had cesarean indication and hospitalized to give birth by a cesarean section. The actual birth weight of newborn babies and the estimated fetal weights obtained with 24 formulas were compared. Additionally, the data obtained were separated according to the gender of the newborns and the most appropriate formulas for fetal gender were tried to be determined separately. Results: The lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values which are the best indicator of success to predict were obtained as 301.8 gr, 284.9 gr and 304.4 gr with the formula of Schild et al. Male for all, the formula of Schild et al. Female for male fetuses and the formula of Campbell and Wilkinfor female fetuses, respectively. Conclusion: The formulas of Schild et al. Male, Schild et al. Female, and Campbell and Wilkin were selected as the best formulas for all fetuses, male fetuses and female fetuses, respectively, for estimating fetal weights in Turkish population.
dc.identifier.citationKoçak, Ö., & Koçak, C. (2021). Finding the best formulas to estimate fetal weight based on ultrasound for the Turkish population: a comparison of 24 formulas. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48(3), 676-685.
dc.identifier.doi10.31083/j.ceog.2021.03.2399
dc.identifier.endpage685en_US
dc.identifier.issn0390-6663
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108460447
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.startpage676en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog.2021.03.2399
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7249
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000672642900035
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorKoçak, Özgür
dc.institutionauthorKoçak, Cem
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherImr Press
dc.relation.ispartofClinical And Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectFetal Weight Estimationen_US
dc.subjectBirth Weighten_US
dc.subjectFetal Weight Formulasen_US
dc.subjectFoetal Weighten_US
dc.subjectPrenatal Ultrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectObstetric Ultrasounden_US
dc.titleFinding the best formulas to estimate fetal weight based on ultrasound for the Turkish population: a comparison of 24 formulas
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ozgur-kocak2021.pdf
Boyut:
433.32 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu