Reliability and validity of a turkish language version of the bates-jensen wound assessment tool

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Azize
dc.contributor.authorToruner, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorAbbasoğlu, Aysel
dc.contributor.authorTekindal, Agah
dc.contributor.authorBüyükgönenç, Lale Ayşegül
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:59:05Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:59:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemşirelik Bölümü
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate content and construct validity of a Turkish language version of the Bates Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) as well as its internal consistency and interrater reliability. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The study was conducted in 13 intensive care units that included patients with pressure ulcers; the units were located in a university hospital in Central Anatolia, Turkey. The sample comprised 70 nurses and 20 patients who have stage II, III, and IV pressure ulcers. METHODS: Data were collected between January and April 2011. Content validity was measured using the Davis Technique. The BWAT was scored by 2 groups, nurses with expertise in wound care and staff nurses. An expert nurse and a ward nurse conducted pressure ulcer evaluation on the same patient consecutively in order to determine interrater reliability. We also measured internal consistency via the Cronbach [alpha]. RESULTS: The content validity agreement rate was 0.82. The interrater reliability of the instrument was 0.82; its internal consistency calculated via the Cronbach [alpha] was 0.85. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study support the Turkish language version of the BWAT as possessing content validity, interrater reliability and internal consistency.
dc.identifier.citationKarahan, A., Toruner, E. K., Ceylan, A., Abbasoğlu, A., Tekindal, A., Büyükgönenç, L. (2014). Reliability and validity of a turkish language version of the bates-jensen wound assessment tool. Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 41(4), 340-344.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/WON.0000000000000036
dc.identifier.endpage344en_US
dc.identifier.issn1071-5754
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage340en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1250
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBates Wound Assessment Toolen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectWound Assessmenten_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of a turkish language version of the bates-jensen wound assessment tool
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu