Comparison of shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings between patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients with healthy controls

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Ayla Cagliyan
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Oguzhan
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorMusmul, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Fusun
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T15:05:11Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T15:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.department[Belirlenecek]
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Shoulder involvement is frequently observed in chronic renal disease (CRD) and hemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to compare shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings of stage 4 CRD patients naive to dialysis, hemodialysis patients and healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty hemodialysis patients with shoulder pain (Group 1), 30 hemodialysis patients without shoulder pain (Group 2), 20 patients with stage 4 CRD (Group 3) and 30 healthy controls (Group 4) were enrolled. Urea, creatinine and beta 2 microglobulin were measured. Thickness, homogeneity and integrity of rotator cuff and presence of effusion were examined by MRI. RESULTS: Supraspinatus tendon was thicker in Group 1 compared to other groups, whereas infraspinatus tendon was thicker in Group 1 compared to Groups 2 and 4. Although all tendons thickness was higher in Group 3 than Group 4, there was no significant difference. Most effusion areas were present in Group 1, followed by Groups 2 and 3. There was a significant correlation between glomerular filtration rate and thickness of supraspinatus, infraspinatus tendons and between beta 2 microglobulin and thickness of infraspinatus, subscapularis tendons and total number of areas with effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Increased shoulder tendon thickness and effusion were detected in symptomatic dialysis patients, while greater effusion areas were detected in asymptomatic dialysis patients and in stage 4 CRD patients who do not require dialysis compared to healthy controls.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-170896
dc.identifier.endpage184en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issn1878-6324
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31450486
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078119924
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-170896
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7159
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000522151500002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthor[Belirlenecek]
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIos Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Back And Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAmyloidosisen_US
dc.subjectbeta(2) microglobulinen_US
dc.subjectchronic kidney diseaseen_US
dc.subjecthemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectshoulderen_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleComparison of shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings between patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients with healthy controls
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu