The evolution of the regional anesthesia: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis between 1980-2019

dc.contributor.authorKayir, Selcuk
dc.contributor.authorKisa, Alperen
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T15:03:10Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T15:03:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.department[Belirlenecek]
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study used bibliometric analysis of articles published about the topic of regional anesthesia from 1980-2019 with the aim of determining which countries, organizations, and authors were effective, engaged in international cooperation, and had the most cited articles and journals. Methods: All articles published from 1980-2019 included in the Web of Science database and found using the keywords regional anesthesia/anaesthesia, spinal anesthesia/anaesthesia, epidural anesthesia/anaesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia/ anaesthesia, combined spinal-epidural, and peripheral nerve block in the title section had bibliometric analysis performed. Correlations between the number of publications from a country with gross domestic product (GDP), gross domestic product (at purchasing power parity) per capita (GDP PPP), and human development index (HDI) values were investigated with the Spearman correlation coefficient. The number of articles that will be published in the future was estimated with linear regression analysis. Results: Literature screening found 11,156 publications. Of these publications, 6,452 were articles. The top 4 countries producing articles were United States of America (n = 1,583), Germany (585), United Kingdom (510), and Turkey (386). There was a significant positive correlation found between the GDP, GDP PPP, and HDI markers for global countries with publication productivity (r = 0.644, P < 0.001; r = 0.623, P < 0.001, r = 0.542, P < 0.001). The most productive organizations were Harvard University and the University of Toronto. Conclusions: This comprehensive study presenting a holistic summary and evaluation of 6,452 articles about this topic may direct anesthesiologists, doctors, academics, and students interested in this topic.
dc.identifier.doi10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.82
dc.identifier.endpage93en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-9159
dc.identifier.issn2093-0569
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33380571
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099381770
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage82en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.82
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/7003
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000614546100010
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthor[Belirlenecek]
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKorean Pain Soc
dc.relation.ispartofKorean Journal Of Pain
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectConductionen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectEpiduralen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSpinalen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiologistsen_US
dc.subjectBibliographies as Topicen_US
dc.subjectBibliometricsen_US
dc.subjectGross Domestic Producten_US
dc.subjectNerve Blocken_US
dc.subjectPublicationsen_US
dc.titleThe evolution of the regional anesthesia: a holistic investigation of global outputs with bibliometric analysis between 1980-2019
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar