Painful and painless shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging comparisons in hemodialysis patients and correlation with clinical findings

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇağlıyan Türk, Ayla
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Ferda
dc.contributor.authorTomak, Leman
dc.contributor.authorÖzkurt, Sultan
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Füsun
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T08:58:55Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T08:58:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Shoulder pain is frequently observed in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare haemodialysis patients with or without shoulder pain in terms of shoulder motion ranges, ?2 microglobulin levels and magnetic resonance imaging findings. METHODS: Forty-three patients undergoing dialysis were enrolled, of which 23 patients had explicit shoulder pain at night, which appeared during dialysis. Range of joint motion was evaluated. ?2 microglobulin value was recorded. MRI was used to evaluate rotator cuff tendons for thickness, homogeneity, integrity and presence of effusion. RESULTS: Ranges of motion were significantly lower in the painful shoulder group. Supraspinatus tendon thickness and the number of areas with effusion were higher in the painful group. There was a positive correlation between the ?2 microglobulin level and supraspinatus (r:0.352 p <0.05) and subscapular (r:0.454 p <0.05) tendon thicknesses. While effusion areas and pain (r:0.351 p < 0.05) showed positive correlation, there was a negative correlation between pain and shoulder motion ranges. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder pain in dialysis patients can be related with tendon thickness and effusion.While the ?2 microglobulin level affects tendon thickness, it has no relation to pain and movement constraint. © 2017 - IOS Press and the authors.
dc.identifier.citationÇağlıyan Türk, A., Fidan, N., Özcan, O., Özdemir, F., Tomak, L., Özkurt, S., Şahin, F. (2017). Painful and painless shoulder magnetic resonance imaging comparisons in hemodialysis patients and correlation with clinical findings. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 30(1), 63-69.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-160715
dc.identifier.endpage69en_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-160715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1221
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIOS Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAmyloidosisen_US
dc.subjectHaemodialysisen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imagingen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Painen_US
dc.subjectβ2 Microglobulinen_US
dc.titlePainful and painless shoulder Magnetic Resonance Imaging comparisons in hemodialysis patients and correlation with clinical findings
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu