Biomechanical comparison of different suture materials with different techniques in tendon repair: An ex-vivo study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMuslu, Ümran
dc.contributor.authorAlıç, Taner
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Emre
dc.contributor.authorGölpınar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBilici, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorDemirezen, Murat Okan
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T10:19:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T10:19:27Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractObjectives Sheep Achilles tendons are used as an effective preclinical model of flexor tendon repair in plastic surgery, due to their biomechanical properties, which are similar to humans. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and biomechanical outcomes of suture materials and tendon repair techniques in flexor tendon repair. Material and methods 72 sheep tendons were obtained for a total of 12 different scenarios. Tendons were repaired using 4 different suture types and 3 different suture techniques. After repair, the tendons were fixed at both ends and subjected to biomechanical tests. Ultimate Failure Load (UFL) and 2-mm Gap Load (GL) per scenario were compared statistically within and between groups. Results UFL and GL of all sutures were significantly different between the modified Kessler, Bunnell and Krackow techniques (P?<?0.05), and between Monosorb, Ti-Cron and V-loc sutures (P?<?0.05). UFL and GL according to repair technique were not significantly different for the Propilen suture (P?>?0.05). Conclusion When UFL and GL were considered together, our findings indicate that optimal strength scenarios were for the modified Kessler technique using Monosorb or V-loc sutures.
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by Zeynep Umut NARİN (umutarslan@hitit.edu.tr) on 2024-01-31T10:19:15Z No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceApproved for entry into archive by Zeynep Umut NARİN (umutarslan@hitit.edu.tr) on 2024-01-31T10:19:27Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-01-31T10:19:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2023en
dc.identifier.citationMuslu, Ü., Alıç, T., Demir, E., Gölpınar, M., Bilici, İ., & Demirezen, M. O. (2023). Biomechanical comparison of different suture materials with different techniques in tendon repair: An ex-vivo study. Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation, 42(5), 435-441.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.hansur.2023.06.010
dc.identifier.issn2468-1229
dc.identifier.issn2468-1210
dc.identifier.pmid37453716
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2023.06.010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/8766
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001086054500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorAlıç, Taner
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Emre
dc.institutionauthorGölpınar, Murat
dc.institutionauthorBilici, İbrahim
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartofHand Surgery and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBiomechanical comparisonen_US
dc.subjectTendon repair techniquesen_US
dc.subjectSuture materialsen_US
dc.subjectModified Kessleren_US
dc.subjectBunnellen_US
dc.subjectKrackowen_US
dc.titleBiomechanical comparison of different suture materials with different techniques in tendon repair: An ex-vivo study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu