The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBeker Acay, Mehtap
dc.contributor.authorFidan, Nurdan
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKatırağ, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorÜlker, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorAcay, Akif
dc.contributor.authorYücel, Aylin
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T09:03:20Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T09:03:20Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentHitit Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the analysis and publication rates of abstracts presented at the Turkish National Radiology meetings in 2010–2012. METHODS: Abstracts presented in the national radiology meetings of 2010, 2011, and 2012 were included in the study. The presentations were classified according to presentation type (oral or poster presentations), study type, study design, imaged organ or body systems, imaging modalities, time interval between the presentation and the publication date, and the journal in which the article was published. The conversion rate of presentations into full-text articles in peer-reviewed journals were surveyed through PubMed. The time from presentation in the meetings to publication was determined. The distribution of journals was also demonstrated. RESULTS: The total number of presentations submitted in three national radiology meetings was 3,192. The publication rate was 11% for the 2010 meeting, 8.2% for the 2011 meeting, and 9.6% for the 2012 meeting. A total of 300 papers were published, with an average of 15 months (range, 0–42 months) between presentation and final publication. The first three refereed international journals with the most number of papers derived from these meetings were Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinical Imaging, and European Journal of Radiology. CONCLUSION: The overall publication rate of scientific abstracts from Turkey was lower than those from overseas countries. Encouraging the authors to conduct higher-quality research would raise the publication rate as well as improve the quality and success of our scientific meetings. © Turkish Society of Radiology 2015
dc.identifier.citationBeker Acay, M., Fidan, N., Ünlü, E., Katırağ, A., Ülker, H., Acay, A., Yücel, A. (2015). The fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010–2012. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 21(4), 322-326.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/dir.2015.14451
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.14451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11491/1452
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Radiology
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject[Belirlenecek]en_US
dc.titleThe fate of abstracts presented at Turkish national radiology congresses in 2010-2012
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
fidannurdan.pdf
Boyut:
103.52 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makale Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu